Historical memory in the age of globalization: the case of Russian- Estonian relations
This article contributes to the discussion within the "Towards the Common Past" international academic network bringing together scholars from Russia, the Baltic States and the Nordic countries. It assesses the relationship between globalization and historical memory, thus contributing to the discussion on globalization and the roles and applications of history. On the basis of an analysis of academic discourses on globalization and historical memory, the author arrives at two conclusions. On the one hand, the proponents of globalization use historical memory as one of their arguments: they claim that the history of globalization in international relations stretches back to the 19th century, thus globalization is an irreversible process. On the other hand, globalization attaches international significance to historical events that were earlier considered as being of local importance. The author proves the latter statement through comparing Russian and Estonian discourses on the relationship between the events which took place in Tallinn in September 1944 and April 2007. Highlighting the differences between the two discourses may help Russian scholars understand the reasons behind the political decisions made by the Estonian authorities in April 2007. It accounts for the practical significance of the research conducted, since one of the most important objectives of international relations as a discipline is not to explain what decision would have been the most appropriate in the given situation, but to further the understanding of the reasons behind the actually made decision. The author expresses his gratitude to his counterparts from St. Petersburg State University and the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, as well as those from the Universities of Lund (Sweden), Tampere (Finland), and Tartu (Estonia) for their comments on the earlier versions of the article. At the same time, the author alone bears all the responsibility for the conclusions drawn in the article.
2. Astrov, А. 2009, Etonia: politicheskaja bor'ba za mesto v istorii [Estonia: the political struggle for a place in history], Pro et Contra, no. 3—4 (46), p. 109—124.
3. Braudel, F. 2008, Grammatika civilizacij [Grammar civilizations],Мoscow.
4. Hegel, G. W. F. 1993, Filosofija istorii [Philosophy of History], Moscow.
5. Goncharov, V. E. 2010, Ideologicheskij brending «Edinoj Rossii» [Ideological branding of "United Russia"], POLITEKS = Politicheskaja ekspertiza [Political Expertise Journal], Vol. 6, no. 1, p. 68—82, available at: http://www.politex.info/content/view/683/30/ (accessed 01 June 2010).
6. Gryzlov, B. V. 2001, Politicheskie partii i rossijskie transformacii: teorija i
politicheskaja praktika, avtoref. dis. … d-ra polit. nauk [Political parties and the Russian transformation: theory and political practice: summary of dis.... candidate of political sciences], Saint Petersburg.
7. Kagan, R. 2007, Konec illjuzijam: istorija vozvrawaetsja [End of Illusions:
History returns], Pro et Contra, no. 6 (39), p. 20—40.
8. Lanko, D. А. 2009, Populizm i politicheskoe uchastie: ulichnye besporjadki v stranah Baltijskogo regiona v 2007—2009 gg. [Populism and political participation:the riots in the Baltic States in 2007—2009] POLITEKS = Politicheskaja ekspertiza [Political Expertise Journal], Vol. 6, no 2, p. 209—230, available at: http://www.politex.info/content/view/713/30/ (accessed 12 September 2010).
9. Nietzsche, F. 2008, O pol'ze i vrede istorii dlja zhizni. Sumerki kumirov, ili Kak filosofstvovat' molotom [On the Use and Abuse of History for Life. Twilight of the idols, or how to philosophize hammer]. Moscow.
10. Savelieva, I. М., Poletaev, А. V. 2005, Sociologija znanija o proshlom [The sociology of knowledge about the past], Мoscow.
11. Tocqueville (comte de.), A. 2000, Demokratija v Amerike [Democracy in
12. Fukuyama, F. 2004, Konec istorii i poslednij chelovek [The End of History and the Last Man], Мoscow.
13. Heidegger, М. 1997, Bytie i vremja [Being and Time]. Мoscow.
14. Adams, B. 1902, The New Empire, London.
15. Bernhard, M., Reenock, C., Nordstrom, T. 2003, Economic Performance and Survival in New Democracies: Is There a Honeymoon Effect? Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 36, no. 4, May, p. 404—431.
16. Cornwell, R. 2003, Rumsfeld ‘Mends Fences’ by Lumping Germany with Cuba and Lybia in an Axis of Bad Boys, The Independent, February 8.
17. Kirk, R. 1985, The Conservative Mind: from Burke to Eliot, Washington.
18. McDonald, M. 2010, "Lest We Forget": The Politics of Memory and Australian Military Intervention, International Political Sociology, Vol. 4, no. 3, September, p. 287—302.
19. Needham, R. 1978, Primordial Characters, Charlottesville.
20. Ouellet, J. 2004, Authority, Trade and Ideas: Using Systems Theory to Understand Borders and Identity. In: Khudoley, K., Lanko, D. (ed.), Borders, Identities and Nationalism: Understanding the Relationship, St. Petersburg, p. 16—37.
21. Waltz, K. 1999, Globalization and Governance: James Madison Lecture, Political Science and Politics, Vol. 32, no. 4, December, p. 693—700.