Влияние пандемии COVID-19 на организацию рабочего и личного времени латвийцами

Кришьяне З., Апсите-Берина Э., Берзиньш М., Скадинс Т., Бургманис Г.

Меню статьи

Скачать статью

Процитировать статью

See article in English

DOI:

10.5922/2079-8555-2020-4-3

Ключевые слова

пандемия COVID-19 организация рабочего и личного времени Латвия тип занятости восприятие угроз

Аннотация

В статье рассматриваются особенности организации рабочего и личного времени в Латвии в режиме чрезвычайной ситуации. Во время пандемии COVID-19 многие правительства останавливали экономическую деятельность в своих странах. Введенные ограничения могли не только замедлить распространение вируса, но и нанести значительный ущерб благосостоянию населения. В контексте пандемии COVID-19 будет рассмотрено влияние социально-демографических факторов на модели поведения, установки, занятость и организацию рабочего и личного времени латвийцами; дана хронологическая картина пандемии на уровне страны; описан характер трудовой миграции в Латвию и из нее до начала эпидемии; показано географическое распределение подтвержденных случаев COVID-19. Кроме того, опасность COVID-19 будет проанализирована на глобальном и национальном уровнях, а также на уровне отдельных домохозяйств. В заключение формы занятости и организация рабочего и личного времени будут рассмотрены в разрезе географических зон и возрастных групп.

1. Dowd J. B., Andriano L., Brazel D. M. et al. Demographic science aids in understanding the spread and fatality rates of COVID-19 // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020. Vol. 117, № 18. P. 9696—9698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004911117.

2. Kashnitsky I., Aburto J. M. The pandemic threatens aged rural regions most // OSF Preprints. 2020. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/abx7s.html (дата обращения: 08.09.2020).

3. Mogi R., Spijker J. The influence of social and economic ties to the spread of COVID-19 in Europe // SocArXiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/sb8xn.

4. Raifman M. A., Raifman J. R. Disparities in the population at risk of severe illness from COVID-19 by race/ethnicity and income // American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2020. Vol. 59, № 1. P. 137—139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.04.003.

5. Verhagen M. D., Brazel D. M., Dowd J. B. et al. Mapping hospital demand: demographics, spatial variation, and the risk of “hospital deserts” during COVID-19 in England and Wales. OSF Preprints, 2020 doi: 10.31219/osf.io/g8s96.

6. Esteve A., Permanyer I., Boertien D., Vaupel J. W. National age and co-residence patterns shape COVID-19 vulnerability // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020. Vol. 117, № 28. P. 16118—16120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008764117.

7. Buheji M., Cunha K. The Extent of COVID-19 Pandemic Socio-Economic Impact on Global Poverty // A Global Integrative Multidisciplinary Review. 2020. Vol. 10, № 4. P. 213—224. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20201004.02.

8. Nassif-Pires L., de Lima Xavier L., Masterson T. et al. Pandemic of inequality (Economics public policy brief archive). N. Y., 2020.

9. Brooks S. K., Webster R. K., Smith L. et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence // The Lancet. 2020. № 10227 (395). P. 912—920. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140—6736 (20) 30460—8.

10. Chan J. F. W., Yuan S., Kok K. H. et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: A study of a family cluster // The Lancet. Vol. 395, № 10223. P. 514—523. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736 (20) 30460-8.

11. Pummerer L., Sassenberg K. Conspiracy Theories in Times of Crisis and their Societal Effects: Case “Corona”. PsyarXiv. URL: https://psyarxiv.com/ye3ma/download/?format=pdf (дата обращения 10.09.2020)

12. Šrol J., Mikušková E. B., Cavojova V. When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID-19 pandemic // PsyarXiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f9e6p.

13. Swami V., Barron D. Analytic Thinking, Rejection of Coronavirus (COVID-19) Conspiracy Theories, and Compliance with Mandated Social-Distancing: Direct and Indirect Relationships in a Nationally Representative Sample of Adults in the United Kingdom. OSF Preprints, 2020. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/nmx9w.

14. Zhang Y., Ma F. Z. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health and Quality of Life among Local Residents in Liaoning Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study // Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020 Vol. 17, № 7. P. 2381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072381.

15. Prime H., Wade M., Browne D. T. Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic // American Psychologist. 2020. Vol. 75, № 5. P. 631—643. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000660.

16. Smyth B., Moloney L., Brady J. et al. COVID‐19 in Australia: Impacts on Separated Families // Family Court Review. 2020. Vol. 58, № 4. P. 1022—1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12533.

17. Usher K., Bhullar N., Durkin J. et al. Family violence and COVID‐19: Increased vulnerability and reduced options for support // International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2020. Vol. 29, № 4. P. 549—552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/inm.12735.

18. Li W., Li G., Xin C. et al. Challenges in the Practice of Sexual Medicine in the Time of COVID-19 in China // The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2020. Vol. 17, № 7. P. 1225—1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.04.380.

19. Cito G., Micelli E., Cocci A. et al. Paternal Behaviors in the Era of COVID-19 // The World Journal of Men’s Health. 2020. Vol. 38, № 3. P. 251—253. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.200071.

20. Mandl I., Biletta I. Overview of new forms of employment — 2018 update. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 2018. URL: https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1649&context=intl (дата обращения: 27.07. 2020).

21. Vargas-Llave O., Mandl I., Weber T., Wilkens M. Telework and ICT-based Mobile Work: Flexible Working in the Digital Age. Luxembourg, 2020. URL: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef19032en.pdf (дата обращения: 27.07. 2020).

22. Krišjāne Z., Krūmiņš J. (eds.). Tautas ataudze Latvijā un sabiedrības atjaunošanas izaicinājumi (Population Reproduction and Challenges for Renewal of Society in Latvia). Rīga, 2019.

23. Apsīte-Beriņa E., Burgmanis Ģ., Prusakova L. Regional Human Capital Disequilibria: The Case of Youth Migration in Latvia // Folia Geographica. 2020. № 1 (18). doi: 10.22364/fg.18.4.

24. Baert S., Lippens L., Moens E. et al. The COVID-19 Crisis and Telework: A Research Survey on Experiences, Expectations and Hopes // IZA Discussion Paper. 2020. № 13229. Institute of Labor Economics. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341272740_The_COVID-19_Crisis_and_Telework_A_Research_Survey_on_Experiences_Expectations_and_Hopes (дата обращения: 06.08. 2020).

25. Raišienė A. G., Rapuano V., Varkulevičiūtė K., Stachová K. Working from Home — Who is Happy? A Survey of Lithuania’s Employees during the COVID-19 Quarantine Period // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 13, № 13. P. 5332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135332.

26. Apsīte-Beriņa E., Burgmanis Ģ., Krišjāne Z. Return Migration Trends in Latvia: Re-attracting the Main Human Resource for Sustainable Regional Development // Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2018. Vol. 1. P. 16. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2019vol1.4117.

27. Silina-Osmane I., Ieviņa I. Policy report on migration and asylum policy in Latvia reference year 2018. Rīga, 2019. URL: http://www.emn.lv/wp-content/uploads/ARM_2018_part2_LATVIA_Final_EN.pdf (дата обращения: 08.09.2020).

28. Piuhola J., Kerkelä R., Laine M. et al. Lower ST-elevation myocardial infarction incidence during COVID-19 epidemic in Northern Europe // Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2020.1820563.

29. Kaša R., Mieriņa I. (eds.). The Emigrant Communities of Latvia. National Identity, Transnational Belonging, and Diaspora Politics. Springer, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12092-4.

30. Krišjāne Z., Apsīte-Beriņa E., Bērziņš M. Circularity within the EU: the return intentions of Latvian migrants // Return Migration and Regional Development in Europe: Mobility Against the Stream. L., 2016. P. 215—240. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57509-8_10.

31. McCollum D., Apsīte-Beriņa E., Bērziņš M., Krišjāne Z. Overcoming the crisis: the changing profile and trajectories of Latvian migrants // Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2017. Vol. 43, № 9. P. 1508—1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2016.1232161.

32. Krišjāne Z., Bērziņš M., Ivlevs A., Bauls A. Who are the typical commuters in the post-socialist metropolis? The case of Riga, Latvia // Cities. 2012. Vol. 29, № 5, P. 334—340.

33. Kamenska A., Tumule J. Migrants’ Access to Social Protection in Latvia // Migration and Social Protection in Europe and Beyond. Vol. 1. Springer, 2020. P. 257—270. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51241-5_17.

34. Krzysztofik R., Kantor-Pietraga I., Spórna T. Spatial and functional dimensions of the COVID-19 epidemic in Poland // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2020. P. 1—14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2020.1783337.

35. Ruiu M. L. Mismanagement of COVID-19: lessons learned from Italy // Journal of Risk Research. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1758755.

36. Hedström P., Swedberg R. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge, 1998.

37. Kittel B., Kritzinger S., Boomgaarden H. et al. The Austrian Corona Panel Project: monitoring individual and societal dynamics amidst the COVID-19 crisis // European Political Science. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00294-7.

38. Bodas M., Peleg K. Self-Isolation Compliance In The COVID-19 Era Influenced By Compensation: Findings From A Recent Survey In Israel // Health Affairs. 2020. Vol. 39, № 6. P. 936—941. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00382.

39. Van Bavel J. J., Baicker K., Boggio P. S. et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response // Natural Human Behaviour. 2020. Vol. 4, № 5. P. 460—471. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z.

40. Sharot T. The optimism bias // Current Biology. 2011. Vol. 21, № 23. P. 941—945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030.

41. Griffith A. K. Parental burnout and child maltreatment during the COVID-19 pandemic // Journal of Family Violence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00172-2.