NONE20260606195118137Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Universityno-reply@balticregion.kantiana.ruImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityBaltic Region2079-85552310-052406062026152Дальность миграции населения в России с учетом демографических характеристик мигрантовL. B.Karachurinahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7760-7925N. V.Mkrtchyanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9603-0594The distance of migration is closely linked to life course events, which are, in turn, marked by age. It serves as a criterion for distinguishing migration from other forms of spatial mobility. This paper aims to calculate the average distance of domestic migrations in Russia between 2011 and 2020, considering various migrant profiles such as sex, age, and type of residential registration. The Euclidean distance between 130,000 geocoded Russian settlements was computed to estimate migration distances. These geospatial data enabled us to obtain estimations of migration distances by weighting the total distance of all migrations based on their respective numbers. The distance of internal migration was similarly estimated, taking into account age, sex, and type of residential registration. The findings revealed that 31.3 % of domestic residential relocations occurred within very short distances not exceeding 50 km, while 43.5 % took place within 100 km of the previous place of residence. Calculating the average migration distance allowed us to identify two peaks: one at the ages of 22—23, present only for men, and another at the ages of 50—70. In all other cases, there were no sex-specific differences in migration distances. Migrants who obtained permanent registration at their new place of residence tended to cover greater distances compared to those registered only temporarily. The shortest relocation distances were associated with the age of 16, which could be attributed to prospective students moving to the nearest town where a vocational school is located.0606202642210.5922/2079-8555-2023-2-1https://balticregion.kantiana.ru/baltic_region/5345/41890/Ravenstein, E. G. 1885, The laws of migration, Journal of the Statistical Society, № 46, p. 167—235, https://doi.org/10.2307/2979181.Stillwell, J., Thomas, M. 2016, How far do internal migrants really move? Demonstrating a new method for the estimation of intra-zonal distance, Regional Studies, Regional Science, vol. 3, № 1, p. 28—47, https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1109473.Greenwood, M. J. 1975, Research on internal migration in the United States: A survey, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 13, № 2, p. 397—433.Boehm, T. P., Ihlanfeld, K. R. 2006, Residential mobility and neighborhood quality, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 26, № 2, p. 411—424, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1986.tb00828.x.Schwartz, A. 1973, Interpreting the effect of distance on migration, The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 81, № 5, p. 1153—69.Ritchey, N. P. 1976, Explanations of migration, Annual Review of Sociology, № 2, p. 363— 404.Niedomysl, T., Fransson, U. 2014, On distance and the spatial dimension in the definition of internal migration, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, № 104, p. 357—372, https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.875809.Thomas, M., Gillespie, B., Lomax, N. 2019, Descriptive Finding Variations in migration motives over distance, Demographic research, vol. 40, article 38, p. 1097—1110, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.38.Kulu, H., Milewski, N. 2007, Family change and migration in the life course: аn introduction, Demographic Research, vol. 17, № 19, p. 567—590, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.19.Champion, T., Fotheringham, S., Rees, P., Boyle, P., Stillwell, J. 1998, The Determinants of Migration Flows in England: A Review of Existing Data and Evidence. Newcastle upon Tyne: Report prepared for the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, Department of Geography, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Clark, W. A. V., Withers, S. 2007, Family migration and mobility sequences in the United States: Spatial mobility in the context of the life course, Demographic Research, vol. 17, аrticle 20, p. 591—622, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.20.Niedomysl, T. 2011, How migration motivations change over migration distance: Evidence on variations across socioeconomic and demographic groups, Regional Studies, № 45, p. 843—855, https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003614266.Thomas, D. 1938, Research Memorandum on Migration Differentials, New York: Social Science Research Council.White, M. J., Mueser, P. R. 1988, Implications of Boundary Choice for the Measurement of Residential Mobility, Demography, vol. 25, № 3, p. 443—459.Hipp, J. R., Boessen, А. 2017, The Shape of Mobility: Measuring the Distance Decay Function of Household Mobility, The Professional Geographer, vol. 69, № 1, p. 32—44, https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2016.1157495.van Ham, M., Mulder, C. H., Hooimeijer, P. 2001, Spatial flexibility in job mobility: macrolevel opportunities and microlevel restrictions, Environment and Planning A, № 33, p. 921—940, https://doi.org/10.1068/a33164.Thomas, M., Stillwell, J., Gould, M. 2015, Modelling multilevel variations in distance moved between origins and destinations in England and Wales, Environment and Planning A, № 47, p. 996—1014, https://doi.org/10.1068/a130327p.Plane, D., Jurjevich, J. 2009, Ties That No Longer Bind? The Patterns and Repercussions of Age Articulated Migration, The Professional Geographer, vol. 61, № 1, p. 4—20, https://doi.org/10.1080/00330120802577558.Raymer, J., Abel, G., Smith, P. W. F. 2007, Combining census and registration data to estimate detailed elderly migration flows in England and Wales, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170, № 4, p. 891—908, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00490.x.Rogers, A., Racquillet, R., Castro, L. J. 1978, Model migration schedules and their applications, Environment and Planning A, vol. 10, № 5, p. 475—502, https://doi.org/10.1068/a100475.Nivalainen, S. 2004, Determinants of family migration: short moves vs. long moves, Journal of Population Economics, № 17, p. 157—175, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-003-0131-8.Nisic, N., Kley, S. 2019, Gender-specific effects of commuting and relocation on a couple’s social life. Demographic Research, № 40, p. 1047—1062, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2019.40.36.Mkrtchyan, N. 2021, Sex imbalances in long — term migration flows in Russia, Demographic Review, vol. 8, № 3, p. 6—19, https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v8i3.13264.Gerasimov, A. 2022, Spatial patterns of age — specific sex ratios in Russian intraregional migration, Demographic Review, vol. 9, № 1, p. 92—108, https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v9i1.14575.Ravenstein, E. G. 1889, The Laws of Migration, Journal of the Statistical Society of London, vol. 52, № 2, p. 241—305.Kontuly, T., Tammaru, Т. 2006, Population subgroups responsible for new urbanization and suburbanization in Estonia, European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 13, № 4, p. 319—336, https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776406065435.Halas´, M., Klapka, P. 2021, Revealing the structures of internal migration: A distance and a time-space behaviour perspectives, Applied Geography, vol. 137, 102603, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102603.Long, L., Tucker, C. J., Urton, W. L. 1988, Migration distances: an international comparison, Demography, vol. 25, p. 633—640, https://doi.org/10.2307/2061327.Stillwell, J., Bell, M., Ueffing, P., Daras, K., Charles-Edwards, E., Kupiszewski, M., Kupiszewska, D. 2016, Internal migration around the world: Comparing distance travelled and its frictional effect, Environment and Planning А, vol. 48, № 8, p. 1657— 1675, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16643963.Boyle, P. J., Flowerdew, R. 1997, Improving distance estimates between areal units in migration models, Geographical Analysis, № 29, p. 93—107, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1997.tb00950.x.Tatevosov, R. V. 1971, Analiz dal’nosti migracij gorodskogo naselenija SSSR i nekotorye voprosy modelirovanija i prognozirovanija migracij, Abstract of PhD thesis in Geography, Moscow (in Russ.).Tatevosov, R. V. 1973, An investigation of the law for migration through over the areas. In: Rjabushkin, T. V. (ed.), Statistika migracii naselenija (Population migration statistics), Moscow: Statistika, р. 35—48 (in Russ.).Mkrtchyan, N. V., Karachurina, L. B. 2004, Range of interdistrict migration in Russia: tendencies and modern situation. In: Korovkin, A. G. (ed.), Nauchnye trudy INP RAN [Scientific Articles — Institute of Economic Forecasting Russian Academy of Sciences], Moscow: MAKS Press, р. 488—504 (in Russ.).Mkrtchyan, N., Gilmanov, R. 2023, Moving Up: Migration Between Levels of the Settlement Hierarchy in Russia in the 2010s, Izvestija RAN. Serija geograficheskaja, vol. 87, № 1, p. 29—41, https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556623010132 (in Russ.).Makhrova, A. G., Babkin, R. A. 2019, Methodological approaches for Moscow urban agglomeration delimitation based on mobile network operators data, Regionalnie issledovanija [Regional Research], № 2, p. 48—57, https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2019-2-5 (in Russ.).Treyvish, A. I. 2009, Gorod, rajon, strana i mir. Razvitie Rossii glazami stranoveda [The City, the Region, the Country and the World: Development of Russia through the eyes of stranoveda], Moscow (in Russ.).Bálint, L., Obádovics, C. 2020, Internal migration: In Monostori, J., ˝Ori, P., Sp´eder, Z. (eds.), Demographic Portrait of Hungary 2018, Budapest: Hungarian Demographic Research Institute, p. 217—235.Karachurina, L. B. 2022, Urbanization and Suburbanization: Which One Determines Population Migration in Moscow Oblast? Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Earth Sciences, vol. 67, № 2, p. 360—381, https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2022.208 (in Russ.).Shryock, H. S., Siegel, J. S. 1971, The Methods and Materials of Demography, Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.Kley, S. 2011, Explaining the Stages of Migration within a Life-course Framework, European Sociological Review, vol. 27, № 4, p. 469—486, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq020.Plane, D. A., Henrie, C. J., Perry, M. J. 2005, Migration up and down the urban hierarchy and across the life course, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 102, № 43, р. 15313—15318, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507312102.Fauzer, V., Lytkina, Е., Fauzer, G. 2017, State preferences for the people in remote and northern territories of Russia, Arctic and North, № 29, p. 90—127, https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2221-2698.2017.29.90 (in Russ.).Sander, N., Bell, M. 2014, Migration and retirement in the life course: An event history approach, Journal of Population Research, vol. 31, № 1, p. 1—27, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-013-9121-1.Karachurina, L., Ivanova, K. 2017, Migration of the Elderly Population in Russia (According to the 2010 Population Census, Regionalnie issledovanija [Regional Research], № 3, p. 51—60 (in Russ.).Gabdrakhmanov, N. K., Karachurina, L. B., Mkrtchyan, N. V., Leshukov, O. V. 2022, Educational Migration of Young People and Optimization of the Network of Universities in Cities of Different Sizes, Educational Studies, № 2, p. 88—116, https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-2-88-116 (in Russ.).Mkrtchyan, N. 2015, Migration in Moscow and Moscow Region: Regional and Structural Peculiarities, Regionalnie issledovanija [Regional Research], № 3, p. 107— 116 (in Russ.).Choudinovskikh, O. S. 2004, On the critical state of migration accounting in Russia, Voprosy statistiki, № 10, p. 27—36 (in Russ.).Сравнительный анализ территориального опорного каркаса расселения в приморских регионах (на примере Санкт-­Петербургского региона и Калининградской области)N. M.Mezhevichhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3513-2962D. I.Olifirhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0784-7699As a scientific method, comparative studies respond to the needs of society. However, the logic of globalisation has reduced the demand for comparative analysis in international and national (regional) studies. Nevertheless, old, settled coastal areas — which European urban science considers as evidence of the decisive effect of coastal position on spatial development and urbanisation — remain valid research objects. Achieving corresponding theoretical and practical goals requires qualitative and quantitative analysis of urbanisation in coastal areas. This article aims to determine whether the territorial support frameworks of settlement in the St. Petersburg and Kaliningrad regions meet the modern conditions of settlement system development. A cartographic modelling of the settlement structures of the two Russian regions was carried out using Golden Software Surfer 20. The models obtained were supplemented with isolines reflecting the fields of the spatial structure of urban settlement. The settlement systems were analysed from the standpoint of transport communications, using the Engel and Goltz coefficients. The coefficient values show that road transport is the most developed in the study regions, while river transport is the least developed. It is concluded that spatial development is leading to urbanisation and reinforcing the monocentric model of spatial structure. However, the economic effects of monocentricity are almost exhausted, and the limits of polarisation and effective growth attainable with the model are nearly reached. This calls for a transition to a polycentric urbanisation model through developing local centres and enhancing transport connectivity between them. It seems that, in the new economic and political conditions, Russia’s two coastal border regions will benefit the most from the linear-­nodal settlement. The study identified the local cores that can lay the foundation for the transition to the new settlement model.06062026234010.5922/2079-8555-2023-2-2https://balticregion.kantiana.ru/baltic_region/5345/41891/Druzhinin, A. G. 2017, Transgranichnoe klasteroobrazovanie v primorskih zonah Evropejskoj chasti Rossii: faktory, modeli, jekonomicheskie i jekisticheskie jeffekty [Cross-border cluster formation in the coastal zones of the European part of Russia: factors, models, economic and environmental effects], Rostov-on-Don: Publishing House of the Southern Federal University, 421 p. (in Russ.).Lever, W. F. 1999, Competitive Cities in Europe, Urban Studies, vol. 36, № 5-6, p. 1029— 1044, https://doi.org/10.1080/004209899334.Singleton, A. D., Longley, P. 2015, The internal structure of Greater London: a comparison of national and regional geodemographic models, Geo. Open Access: geography and environment, vol. 2, № 1, p. 69—87, https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.7.Fang, C., Yu, D. 2017, Urban agglomeration: An evolving concept of an emerging phenomenon, Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 162, p. 126—136, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.014.Klaesson, J., Johansson, B., Karlsson, Ch. 2011, Metropolitan Regions: Preconditions and Strategies for Growth and Development in the Global Economy, CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper № 253, August.Lei, W., Jiao, L., Xu, G., Zhou, Z. 2022, Urban scaling in rapidly urbanising China, Urban Studies, vol. 59, № 9, p. 1889—1908, https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211017817.Jacobs, J. 2011, Smert’ i zhizn’ bol’shih amerikanskih gorodov [Death and Life of Big American Cities], Moscow: New Publishing House, 460 p.Paulsen, K. 2012, Yet even more evidence on the spatial size of cities: Urban spatial expansion in the US, 1980—2000, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 42, р. 561—568, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.02.002.Logan, J. R., Molotch, H. L. 1987, Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 383 p.Krugman, P. 1999, The Role of Geography in Development, International Regional Science Review, vol. 22, iss. 2, р. 142—161, https://doi.org/10.1177/016001799761012.Roseland, M., Soots, L. 2014, “Strengthening local economies” from state of the world 2007: Our urban future (2007), In: The Sustainable Urban Development Reader, Third Edition, p. 293—303.Makhrova, A., Nefedova, T., Treyvish, A. 2012, Moskovskaja aglomeracija i «Novaja Moskva» [Moscow agglomeration and «New Moscow»], Pro et Contra, November—December, p. 19—32 (in Russ.).Thisse, J.-F. 2012, Novaja jekonomicheskaja geografija i Gorod [New economic geography and city], Center for Market Studies and Spatial Economics, URL: https://ces.hse.ru/2012/04/16/thisse_neg (accessed 23.10.2022).Rastvortseva, S. N., Snitko, L. T. 2020, Regional specialization and agglomeration effects in the Russian economy, Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, vol. 13, № 3, p. 46—58, https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2020.3.69.4 (in Russ.).Glaeser, E. L. 2008, Cities, Agglomeration and Spatial Equilibrium, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 275 р.Borsdorf, A., Salet, W. 2007, Spatial reconfiguration and problems of governance in urban regions of Europe: An introduction to the Belgeo issue on advanced service sectors in European urban regions, Belgeo, № 1, р. 3—14, https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.11604.Friedmann, J. 1966, Regional development policy, Boston: The MIT Press, 317 p.Wallerstein, I. 2006, Mirosistemnyj analiz [World-system analysis], Moscow: Publishing House «Territory of the Future», 248 p. (in Russ.).Florida, R. 2017, The New Urban Crisis: How Our Cities Are Increasing Inequality, Deepening Segregation, and Failing the Middle Class — and What We Can Do About It, Hachette UK: Basic Books, 336 p.Storper, M. 2013, Keys to the City: How Economics, Institutions, Social Interaction, and Politics Shape Development, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 288 p.Rodriguez-Pose, A., Storper, M. 2020, Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality, Urban Studies, vol. 57, № 2, p. 223—248, https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019859458.Fox, S., Goodfellow, T. 2022, On the conditions of «late urbanization», Urban Studies, vol. 59, № 10, p. 1959—1980, https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098021103265.Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C. F. 2022, Smart cities and urban inequality, Regional Studies, vol. 56, № 7, p. 1097—1112, https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1984421.Nugent, D., Suhail, A. 2021, Crisis, disorder and management: Smart cities and contemporary urban inequality, In: Pardo, I., Prato, G. (eds.), Urban Inequalities. Palgrave Studies in Urban Anthropology, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51724-3_8.Gritsai, O. V., Ioffe, G. V., Treivish, A. I. 1991, Centr i periferija v regional’nom razvitii [Center and periphery in regional development], Moscow: Nauka, 168 p. (in Russ.).Zubarevich, N. 2019, Inequality of regions and large cities of Russia: what was changed in the 2010s?, Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, № 4, p. 57—70, https://doi.org/10.31857/S086904990005814-7 (in Russ.).Golubchikov, O. Y., Makhrova, A. G. 2013, Factors of unequal development of russian cities, Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Seriya Geografiya, № 2, p. 54—60 (in Russ.).Nefedova, T. G., Treyvish, A. I. 1998, «Sil’nye» i «slabye» goroda Rossii [«Strong» and «weak» cities of Russia], Poles and growth centers in regional development, Moscow: Institute of Geography of the Russian Academy of Sciences, p. 157—167 (in Russ.).Manaeva, I. V. 2017, Specifics of socio-economic inequality in Russian cities, Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, vol. 16, № 5, p. 960—970, https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.16.5.960 (in Russ.).Turok, I., McGranahan, G. 2013, Urbanization and Economic Growth: The Arguments and Evidence for Africa and Asia, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 25, № 2, р. 465—482, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813490908.Guevara, K. 2016, Effects of growth agglomeration in spatially interdependent regions of Latin America, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, vol. 11, № 7, р. 1350—1367.Duran, H. E., Ozkan, S. 2015, Trade Openness, Urban Concentration and City-Size Growth In Turkey, Regional Science Inquiry, № 7, р. 35—46.Polyan, P. M. 1988, Metodika vydelenija i analiza opornogo karkasa rasselenija [Methods for isolating and analyzing the supporting frame of settlement], Part 1, Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Institute of Geography, 220 p. (in Russ.).Druzhinin, A. G. 2016, Social’no-jekonomicheskoe razvitie primorskih territorij Evropejskoj chasti Rossii: faktory, trendy, modeli [Socio-economic development of the coastal territories of the European part of Russia: factors, trends, models], Rostov-on-Don: Publishing House of the Southern Federal University, 236 p. (in Russ.).Baklanov, P. Ya. 2022, Sustainable development of coastal regions: geographical and geopolitical factors and limitations, Baltic region, vol. 14, № 1, p. 4—16, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2022-1-1.Roos, G., Kubina, N. Ye., Farafonova, Yu. Yu. 2021, Opportunities for sustainable economic development of the coastal territories of the Baltic sea region in the context of digital transformation, Baltic region, vol. 13, № 2, p. 7—26, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2021-2-1.Fedorov, G. M., Korneevets, V. S. 2015, Socioeconomic typology of Russia’s coastal regions, Baltic region, № 4, p. 121—134, https://doi.org/10.5922/2074-9848-2015-4-7.Lachininsky, S. S., Semenova, I. V. 2015, Saint Petersburg as a global coastal city: positioning in the Baltic region, Baltic region, № 3, p. 62—75, https://doi.org/10.5922/2074-9848-2015-3-4.Lachininsky, S. S., Semenova, I. V. 2015, Sankt-Peterburgskij primorskij region: geojekonomicheskaja transformacija territorii [St. Petersburg Primorsky Region: Geoeconomic Transformation of the Territory], St. Petersburg: Lema, 191 p. (in Russ.).Druzhinin, A. G., Lachininskii, S. S., Krasnov, A. I., Sorokin, I. S. 2016, The polarization of system moving in the coastal zone of the Leningrad region in 1989—2015, Bulletin of Higher Education Institutes North Caucasus region. Natural sciences, № 3 (191), p. 58—65, https://doi.org/10.18522/0321-3005-2016-3-58-65 (in Russ.).Fedorov, G. M., Kuznetsova, T. Y., Razumovskii, V. M. 2017, How the proximity of the sea affects development of economy and the settlement pattern in Kaliningrad oblast, Regional Research of Russia, vol. 7, № 4, p. 352—362, https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970517040025.Gumenyuk, I. S., Gumenyuk, L. G., Belov, N. S. 2019, «Primorsky factor» in the programs of spatial development of municipalities of the Kaliningrad region, Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University I. Kant, Series: Natural and Medical Sciences, № 2, p. 5—22 (in Russ.).Solodilov, V. V. 2021, Sectoral special features of territorial development of Petersburg city agglomeration, Economy of the North-West: problems and development prospects, № 2 (65), p. 101—112, https://doi.org/10.52897/2411-4588-2021-2-101-112 (in Russ.).Losin, L. A., Solodilov, V. V. 2020, Strategic transport planning for the development of the St. Petersburg urban agglomeration, Economy of the North-West: problems and development prospects, № 1 (60), p. 84—93 (in Russ.).Sviridenko, M. V. 2021, Promising sub-centers for the development of the St. Petersburg agglomeration: trends and opportunities for spatial transformation, Economics and Management, vol. 27, № 2, p. 74—83 (in Russ.).Lachininsky, S. S., Sorokin, I. S. 2021, Spatial structure and features of the development of settlements in the St. Petersburg agglomeration, Baltic region, vol. 13, № 1, p. 48—69, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2021-1-3.Kalmykov, M. Yu. 2021, Substantiation of the feasibility of intracity rail communication on the example of the St. Petersburg agglomeration, Economics of the North-West: problems and development prospects, № 2 (65), p. 78—85, https://doi.org/10.52897/2411-4588-2021-2-78-85 (in Russ.).Gumenyuk, I. S., Yustratova, V. O. 2021, Transformation of the settlement system in the Kaliningrad region, Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University I. Kant, Series: Natural and Medical Sciences, № 3, p. 31—41 (in Russ.).Belova, A. V. 2018, Semi-medium cities of the Kaliningrad region and their potential for the settlement field, Pskov Regional Journal, № 3 (35), p. 26—34 (in Russ.).Динамика численности населения и трансформация системы расселения Польши (к итогам переписи 2021 года)V. L.Martynovhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-1719I. E.Sazonovahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3456-1223This article aims to analyse current geodemographic changes in Poland, based on the data of the 2021 National Population and Housing Census. Methods, traditional for socioeconomic geography, such as zoning, were employed. Poland’s population decreased during the inter-­census period (2011—2021), with the urban population declining faster than its rural counterpart. The large voivodeships aligned along the Vistula ‘axis’ — Mazowiecka, Lesser Poland and Pomerania — outperform other Polish regions in geodemographic terms. The situation is relatively favourable in Greater Poland, where the country’s main motorways converge. Districts and voivodeships where the geodemographic situation is more vulnerable can be divided into two groups: depressed and backward. The first one includes the traditionally industrial voivodeships of Southern and Central Poland; the second mainly consists of eastern voivodeships. The population decline in Eastern Poland is gathering pace: the 2021 census shows, a more or less favourable geodemographic situation is observed only in the main eastern cities and their environs. This state of affairs is largely due to the Polish government deliberately halting cooperation with Russia and Belarus, including cross-­border collaborations. Yet, this decision seems to create more problems for Poland than its eastern neighbours. If the current trends persist, the eastern voivodeships, the stronghold of the right-wing conservatives in power, may not only rapidly lose population but also face a reduction in the level of socioeconomic development.06062026416110.5922/2079-8555-2023-2-3https://balticregion.kantiana.ru/baltic_region/5345/41892/Łakomy, M. 2016, Demografia polityczna i możliwości dla polityki pronatalistycznej w Polsce, Studia demograficzne, № 1 (169), s. 65—91, https://doi.org/10.33119/sd.2016.1.3 (in Polish).Porter-Szucs, B. 2011, Faith and Fatherland: Catholicism, Modernity, and Poland, Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195399059.001.0001.Jedrzychowska, А., Kwiecień, I., Poprawska, E. 2020, The motherhood pension gap in a defined contribution pension scheme — the case of Poland, Sustainability, vol. 12, № 11, 4425, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114425.Degusarova, V. S., Martynov, V. L., Sazonova, I. E. 2015, Demographic development of Poland during its membership in the European Union, Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society, vol. 147, № 1, p. 77—86 (in Russ.).Parysek, J., Mierzejewska, L. 2012, Trajectories of the demographic development of Poland after 1989, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, № 17, s. 109—115, https://doi.org/10.1515/v10089-012-0011-7.Semiv, S., Berezivskiy, Y., Baranyak, I., Mulska, O., & Ivaniuk, U. 2021, Priorities and tools of regulation of external migration in the Carpathian region of Ukraine, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7, № 2, p. 160—181, https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2021.07.02.09.Szymańska, W., Michalski, T. 2019, Population changes in former voivodeship cities in Poland in the context of suburbanization processes and loss of the administrative function, Environmental and Socio-Economic Studies, vol. 7, № 3, p. 66—78. doi: 10.2478/environ-2019-0018.Górz, B., Kurek, W. 2000, The population of the Polish countryside: Demography and living conditions, GeoJournal, № 50, p. 101—104, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007131515578.Zhirov, A. A. 2019, Migration processes on the recovered territories in Poland in 1945—1950, Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, № 1, p. 78—87 (in Russ.).Rudnicki, R., Jezierska-Thöle, A., Wiśniewski, Ł., Janzen, J., Kozłowski, L. 2018, Former political borders and their impact on the evolution of the present-day spatial structure of agriculture in Poland, Studies in Agricultural Economics, vol. 120, № 1, p. 8—16, https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1728.Fedorov, G. M. 2014, Current issues in the geodemographic studies in Russia, Baltic region, 2014, № 2, p. 4—21, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2014-2-1.Kuznetsova, T. Yu., Fedorov, G. M. 2011, The territorial differentiation of demographic development of the Baltic microregion, Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, № 1, p. 131—137 (in Russ.).Zinovyev, A., Turov, N., Golikov, A. 2018, Post-socialist changes in the political and geographical structure of Poland, Pskov Journal of Regional Studies, № 1 (33), p. 24—39 (in Russ.).Palmowski, T., Fedorov, G. M. 2019, The development of a Russian-Polish cross-border region: the role of the Kaliningrad agglomeration and the Tri-City (Gdansk — Gdynia — Sopot), Baltic region, vol. 11, № 4, p. 6—19, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2019-4-1.Kuznetsova, T. Yu. 2018, Population change in the neighbouring regions of Russia and the European Union countries, Baltic region, vol. 10, № 3, p. 41—57, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2018-3-3.Lialikova, V. I., Kalinina, E. N. 2016, Factors improving quality of life in the Polish regions, Vesnik of Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, Series 5. Economics. Sociology. Biology, vol. 6, № 3, p. 61—72 (in Russ.).Martynov, V. L., Sazonova, I. E. 2021, Territorial features of demographic development in Poland under the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, Pskov Journal of Regional Studies, № 1 (45), p. 37—45, https://doi.org/10.37490/S221979310013636-2 (in Russ.).Druzhinin, P. V., Molchanova, E. V. 2021, The first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Russian regions: comparison of the change in the mortality rate, Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, vol. 14, № 7, p. 1028—1038, https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0782.Druzhinin, P. V., Molchanova, E. V. 2021, Mortality rates in Russian regions in the context of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Regionology = Russian Journal of Regional Studies, vol. 29, № 3, p. 666—685, https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.116.029.202103.666-685 (in Russ.).Wojska radzieckie w Polsce 1939—1993. 2013, Legnica: Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Witelona, 504 s.Popov, A. A. 2011, The history of the development of the Silesian Voivodeship in the context of the regional policy of Poland and the European Union (1990s — 2000s), Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Ural’skij region. № 1, p. 65—73.Petrovskaya, O. 2012, Formation of the borders of Western Belarus in 1939—1940, Zhurnal rossijskih i vostochnoevropejskih istoricheskih issledovanij, № 1 (4), р. 24—42 (in Russ.).Markelov, N. A. 2017, Belostok region after the second world war: soviet-polish border and the ethnic problem, Klio, № 12 (132), p. 159—164 (in Russ.).Bugowski, L. K. 2019, Demographic determinants of the regional development in Eastern Poland, Economic and Environmental Studie, vol. 19, № 2, p. 163—183, https://doi.org/10.25167/ees.2019.50.1.Kuznetsov, A. 2009, Regional Economic Policy of Poland, World Eсonomy and International Relations, 2009, № 11, p. 68—77, https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2009-11-68-77 (in Russ.).Fedorov, G. M. 2016, The problems of cross-border region-formation in the Russian regions on Baltic, Social’no-jekonomicheskaja geografija. Vestnik associacii rossijskih geografov-obshhestvovedov, № 2, p. 82—92 (in Russ.).Gumenyuk, I. S., Studzieniecki, T. 2018, Current and prospective transport connections between Poland’s border voivodeships and Russia’s Kaliningrad region, Baltic region, vol. 10, № 2, p. 114—132, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2018-2-8.Gulina, O., Pozniak, A. 2018, Ukrainian Migration to Russia and Europe: New Trends and Its Consequences, The Journal of Social Policy Studies, vol. 16, № 4, p. 561— 576, https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2018-16-4-561-576 (in Russ.).Martynov, V. L., Sazonova, I. E. 2017, Modern geodemographic problems of the European Union and the migration crisis of the 2010s, Baltic region, vol. 9, № 1, p. 68— 80, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2017-1-6.Martynov, V. L. 2001, Communications’ Environment of the World and Social Development, World Eсonomy and International Relations, № 1, p. 27—33, https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2001-1-27-33 (in Russ.).Zelenyuk, J. M. 2017, Social, Economic and Territorial Aspects of Poland’s Integration into the European Union, The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Earth Sciences, vol. 21, p. 46—58 (in Russ.).Kuznetsov, A. V. 2016, I Is Poland a Bridge or a Barrier for Economic Relations between Germany and Russia?, Sovremennaya Evropa, № 4 (70), p. 79—82, https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope420167982 (in Russ.).Влияние продовольственного эмбарго на потребительские предпочтения и трансграничные практики населения Калининградской областиK. A.Morachevskayahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1269-1059A. V.Lialinahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8479-413XThe Russian food market has been a fascinating subject for researchers investigating food security risks and ways to mitigate them since the embargo was imposed in 2014. The Kaliningrad region, an exclave of Russia, responded more sensitively to the restrictions than any other territory of the country due to the heavy dependence of its food market on imported finished products and raw materials, as well as the transit from Russia via third countries. This study aims to explore how the consumer preferences of Kaliningraders changed in 2014—2021 under the food embargo. The research also investigates changes in the cross-­border mobility of the region’s residents with regard to the practice of shopping for groceries in neighbouring countries. The principal method used in the study is survey research. A survey of 1,019 respondents was conducted in September 2021. Additionally, a comparative analysis of average food prices in the region and neighbouring countries from 2012 to 2019 was carried out based on data from Kaliningradstat and the national statistics services in Poland and Lithuania. The ways to obtain embargoed food were systematised using content analysis of social media, advertising and joint purchase services, travel agency websites, regional news portals and blogs. The study found that rising prices for commodity groups falling under the import ban were the most significant change in the regional food market. As a result, the share of Kaliningrad and Belarusian manufacturers in the regional market basket of consumer goods rose dramatically, as the volume and range of products increased and new manufacturers entered the market. At the same time, the dependence of purchases of “sanctioned” goods on non-material reasons (quality, personal preferences) determined Kaliningraders’ continued commitment to the “old” strategies despite significant restrictions.06062026628110.5922/2079-8555-2023-2-4https://balticregion.kantiana.ru/baltic_region/5346/41893/Palmowski, T., Fedorov, G. M. 2020, The potential for development of Russian-Polish cross-border region, Geography, Environment, Sustainability, vol. 13, № 1, p. 21—28, https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2019-70.Morachevskaya, K. A., Lyzhina, E. A. 2020, Adaptation of food markets of border regions to external challenges: research approaches, Baltic Region — The Region of Cooperation. Regions in the era of global change, The Proceedings of the IV international scientific and practical conference, p. 109—115 (in Russ.).Ucak, H. 2012, Producer price disparities in the EU agriculture: divergence or convergence?, Agricultural Economics (Czech Republic), vol. 58, № 8, p. 367—371, https://doi.org/10.17221/84/2011-agricecon.Nikiforova, I. V. 2015, Dependence on imported food as a threat to the food security of the Kaliningrad region, IKBFU’s Vestnik, № 3, p. 84—90 (in Russ.).Voloshenko, K. Yu. 2021, Economic Security within the Limits of Economic Complexity, Russian Journal of Regional Studies = Regionology, vol. 29, № 2, p. 401—426, https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.115.029.202102.401-426 (in Russ.).Lialina, A., Morachevskaya, K. 2022, Economic Access to Food and COVID-19: New Challenges for the Russian Exclave, Regional Research of Russia, № 12, p. 335— 349, https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522700289.Konkina, V. S. 2019, Economic Availabity of the Food in the Context of Carrying out a Protectionism, ECO, № 8, p. 103—117 (in Russ.).Stupnikova, A. V. 2018, Spatial Reaction of Prices in the Vegetable Markets to Restrictions on Foreign Trade, Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, № 1, p. 117—137 (in Russ.), https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2018.1.117-137.Wegren, S. K., Nikulin, A. M., Trotsuk, I. 2017, The Russian variant of food security, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 64, № 1, p. 47—62, https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2016.1163229.Odegov, J. G., Garnov, A. P. 2018, Import substitution in the food industry of Russia, Federalism, № 1, p. 200—213 (in Russ.).Berendeeva, E. V., Ratnikova, T. A. 2022, Settlement and regional differences in the impact of the food embargo on household consumer spending, Voprosy Ekonomiki, № 3, p. 118—131, https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2022-3-118-131(in Russ.).Volchkova, N. A., Kuznetsova, P. O. 2019, How Much Do Counter-Sanctions Cost: Well-Being Analysis, Journal of the New Economic Association, № 3 (43), p. 173—183, https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2019-43-3-9 (in Russ.).Shagaida, N., Uzun, V. 2017, The food embargo and choice of priopities, Problems of Economic Transition, vol. 59, № 1—3, p. 202—217, https://doi.org/10.1080/10611991.2017.1319197.Voloshenko, K. Yu., Morachevskaya, K. A., Novikova, A. A., Lyzhina, E. A., Kalinovskiy, L. V. 2022, Transformation of food self-sufficiency of Kaliningrad Oblast in the face of external challenges, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Earth Sciences, vol. 67, № 3, p. 409—430, https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2022.302 (in Russ.).Zorina, S. I., Mancewicz, I. 2016, Import Substitution as a factor of regional economic growth agriculture on the example of Kaliningrad region, Research and Scientific Electronic Journal of Omsk SAU, Special Issue, № 2, URL: http://e-journal.omgau.ru/index.php/spetsvypusk-2/31-spets02/412-00161 (in Russ.) (accessed 09.10.2022).Van der Velde, B., Spierings, B. 2007, Cross Border Shopping and the “Bandwith of Familiarity”: Exploring the Positive Impact of National Borders on Consumer Mobility in the Euregion Rhine-Waal, Nijmegen: Nijmegen School of Management, URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2066/69012 (accessed 11.11.2022).Sikos, T. T., Kovács, A. 2011, Retail competitiveness in a middle sized border town (Komárno, Slovakia), Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, vol. 60, № 3, p. 285—306.Stepanova, S. V., Shlapeko, E. A. 2018, Trends in the development of cross-border trade in the Russian-Finnish borderlands, Baltic Region, vol. 10, № 4, p. 103—117, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2018-4-7.Zotova, M., Gritsenko, A., Sebentsov, A. 2018, Everyday Life in the Russian Borderlands: the Motives and Determinants of Cross-border Practices, Universe of Russia, vol. 27, № 4, p. 56— 77, https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2018-27-4-56-77 (in Russ.).Dudzinska, K., Dyner, A. M. 2013, Maly ruch graniczny midzy obwodem kaliningradzkim a Polsk — wyzwania, szanse i zagrozenia, Policy Paper, № 29 (77).Malkowski, A. 2014, Maly ruch graniczny jako element ksztaltowania wspolpracy transgranicznej, Prace naukowe uniwersytetu ekonomicznego we wroclawiu, Research papers of Wroclaw university of economics, № 348, https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2014.348.17.Piekutowska, A. 2016, Maly ruch graniczny — konsekwencje dla regionow przygranicznych, Politeja, Pismo Wydzialu Studiow Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego, № 41, p. 99—114.Anisevich, A., Palmobsky, T. 2014, Polish-Russian local near-border movement: experiense of two years functioning, Nauka i turizm: strategii vzaimodejstviya [Science and Tourism: interaction strategies], № 1, p. 26—31 (in Russ.).Gumenyuk, I. S., Studzieniecki, T. 2018, Current and Prospective Transport Connections between Poland’s Border Voivodeships and Russia’s Kaliningrad Region, Baltic Region, vol. 10, № 2, p. 114—132, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2018-2-8.Lisjakewicz, R. 2016, Geo-economics in trade relations between Poland and Russia, Sovremennaya Evropa, vol. 72, № 6, p. 88—96, https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope620168896 (in Russ.).Palmowski, T., Fedorov, G. M. 2020, Russian-Polish borderland: problems and prospects for the development of cross-border relations, Polis. Political Studies, № 2, p. 178—191, https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.02.13 (in Russ.).Динамический анализ среды функционирования в оценке эффективности научно-исследовательского сектора российских регионовT. R.Gareevhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6438-7772I. Yu.Pekerhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5701-7538T. Yu.Kuznetsovahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1523-2280N. A.Eliseevahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0651-6692The nonparametric method of dynamic data envelopment analysis (DDEA) has become increasingly popular for conducting comparative efficiency evaluations. In recent years,060620268210210.5922/2079-8555-2023-2-5https://balticregion.kantiana.ru/baltic_region/5346/41894/Coelli, T., Rao, P., O’Donnel, C., Battese, G. 2005, An introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer, NY, https://doi.org/10.1007/b136381.Cook, W., Seiford, L. 2009, Data envelopment analysis (DEA) — thirty years on, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 192, № 1, p. 1—17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032.Cooper, W. 2013, Data Envelopment Analysis. In: Gass, S. I., Fu, M. C. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, Boston, p. 349— 358, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1153-7_212.Kao, C. 2014, Network data envelopment analysis: A review, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 239, № 1, p. 1—16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.039.Lee, D-J., Kim, M-S., Lee, K-W. 2022, A revised dynamic data envelopment analysis model with budget constraints, International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 29, № 2, p. 1012—1024, https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12810.Olesen, O. B., Petersen, N. C. 2016, Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis — A review, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 251, № 1, p. 2—21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.058.Krivonozhko, V. E., Utkin, O. B., Volodin, A. V., Sablin, I. A. 2002, Interpretation of modelling results in data envelopment analysis, Managerial Finance, vol. 28, № 9, p. 37—47, https://doi.org/doi:10.1108/03074350210768059.Krivonozhko, V. E., Lychev, A. V. 2010, Analysis of the activities of complex socio-economic systems, M.: МАКS Press, 208 p.Utkin, О. B. 2001, Apparatus for assessing the effectiveness of the functioning of commercial banks, Banking services, № 9, р. 16—19.Gavrilova, А. А., Kolmykov, D. S., Alfeev, А. А. 2006, Multi-criteria evaluation of the efficiency of improved generating equipment of the power system, Journal Vestnik of Samara State Technical University ( Technical Sciences Series), № 40, p. 155—161.Latov, A. V. 2003, Computer visualization of the production possibility set in data envelopment analysis, Doklady akademii nauk, vol. 388, № 2, p. 171—173.Solov’ev, M. N., Pestrikov, S. V. 2008, Development of a mathematical model of comparative assessment of the effectiveness of Russia’s regions, Journal of Samara State Technical University, Ser. Physical and Mathematical Sciences, № 1 (16), р. 175—177.Reiner, G., Hofmann, P. 2012, Efficiency Analysis of Supply Chain Processes, Russian Management Journal, vol. 10, № 2, p. 89—116.Fedotov, Y. V. 2012, Organizational Performance Measurement: Principles of DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) Approach, Russian Management Journal, vol. 10, № 2, p. 51—62.Matrizaev, B. D. 2019, Study of the comparative efficiency of the national innovation system and the quality of economic growth: on the example of a comparative analysis of OECD and BRICS countries, Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, vol. 9, № 3, p. 673—692, https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.9.3.40880.Sazonova, D. D., Sazonov, S. N. 2014, The assessment of technical efficiency of productive resources on farms, Vestnik Cheljabinskoj gosudarstvennoj agroinzhenernoj akademii, vol. 69, p. 117—125.Fedorova, E. A., Korkmazova, B. K., Muratov, M. A. 2015, Assesing the Effectiveness of Joint Companies in Russia: Industry-Specific Features, Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika = Spatial Economics, № 2, p. 47—63, https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2015.2.047-063.Kao, C. 2013, Dynamic data envelopment analysis: A relational analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 227, № 2, p. 325—330, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.012.Gokhberg, L. M. (ed.). 2021, Russian Regional Innovation Scoreboard. Issue 7, Moscow: HSE University, 274 p.Lu, W. 2009, The evolution of R&D efficiency and marketability: Evidence from Taiwan’s IC-design Industry, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, vol. 17, № 2, p. 1—26, https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2009.9668671.Chiu, Y. H., Huang, C. W., Chen, Y. C. 2012, The R&D value-chain efficiency measurement for high-tech industries in China, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 29, p. 989—1006, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9219-3.Chen, K., Kou, M., Fu, X. 2018, Evaluation of multi-period regional R&D efficiency: An application of dynamic DEA to China’s regional R&D systems, Omega, vol. 74, p. 103—114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.01.010.Belgin, O. 2019, Analysing R&D efficiency of Turkish regions using data envelopment analysis, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 31, № 11, p. 1341— 1352, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1613521Firsova, A. A., Chernyshova, G. Y. 2019, Mathematical models for evaluation of the higher education system functions with DEA Approach, Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Mathematics. Mechanics. Informatics, vol. 19, № 3, p. 351—362, https://doi.org/10.18500/1816-9791-2019-19-3-351-362.Zemtsov, S., Kotsemir, M. 2019, An assessment of regional innovation system efficiency in Russia: the application of the DEA approach, Scientometrics, vol. 120, № 2, p. 375—404, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03130-y.Levites, D. G., Punantsev, A. A. 2021, Territorial educational segment as an object of assessment of the functioning conditions of regional education systems, Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania — Perspectives of Science and Education, № 4 (52), p. 577—593, https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.4.38.Khrustalev, E. Yu., Ratner, P. D. 2015, Analysis of ecological efficiency of Russia’s electric companies through the data envelopment analysis methodology, Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, № 35 (434), p. 33—42.Ratner, S. V., Kovalev, A. V. 2021, Assessing the regional environmental management system’s efficiency based on data envelopment models, Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, vol. 20, № 6, p. 1014—1042, https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.20.6.1014.Roslyakova, N. А. 2019, DEA tools for assess the role of labor productivity in the innovative output of the regions of the RF Northwestern federal district and Kazakhstan, Bulletin of the South-Russian State Technical University (NPI) Series Socio-Economic Sciences, № 6, p. 67—75, https://doi.org/10.17213/2075-2067-2019-6-67-75.Pokushko, М., Stupina, А., Medina-Bulo, I., Dresvianskii, Е. 2020, Data envelopment analysis in performance assessment of fuel and energy complex enterprises, Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. series: political, sociological and economic sciences, vol. 5, № 2 (16), p. 251—262, https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2020-5-2-251-262.Ratner, S. 2017, Dynamic problems of estimation of ecological-economic efficiency of regions based on basic models of data envelopment analysis, Large-Scale System Control, № 67, р. 81—106.Komarevtseva, О. О. 2016, Development of model of effective management of changes on the basis of DEA technique in economic systems of municipalities of the Oryol region, Jekonomicheskij zhurnal, № 3 (43), p. 41—58.Alimkhanova, A. N., Mitsel, A. A, 2019, Evaluation of enterprise performance based on the DEA method, Proceedings of TUSUR University, vol. 22, № 2, p. 104—108, https://doi.org/10.21293/1818-0442-2019-22-2-104-108.Greene, W. 2005, Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models, Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 23, p. 7—32, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-004-8545-1.Fritsch, M., Slavtchev, V. 2007, Universities and innovation in space, Industry and Innovation, vol. 14, № 2, p. 201—218, https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710701253466.Sivertsen, G., Rousseau, R., Zhang, L. 2019, Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting, Journal of Informetrics, vol. 13, № 2, p. 679—694, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.010.Dezhina, I. G. 2017, Science and innovation policy of the Russian government: A variety of instruments with uncertain outcomes?, Public Administration Issues, № 5, p. 7—26, https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2017-0-5-7-26.Seiford, L., Zhu, J. 1998, On piecewise loglinear frontiers and log efficiency measures, Computers & Operations Research, vol. 25, № 5, p. 389—395, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(97)00078-6.Saquib, N. 2014, Mathematica for Data Visualization, Packt Publishing.Анализ эффективности функционирования морских портов Балтийского бассейна РоссииH.Kitzmannhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6085-6204E. G.Tsyplakovahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8497-3963G. I.Sinkohttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9966-930XA. V.Strimovskayahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0332-1494К. А.Ryumkinahttps://orcid.org/0009-0002-5038-7875This research presents a comprehensive analysis of the performance efficiency of Russia’s Baltic seaports, taking into account various economic indicators and addressing investment planning and management issues. Special attention is given to the sustainable development goals and objectives of the seaports, considering their significance in transport and logistics systems. The primary objective of this work is to develop a system approach for conducting multi-­criteria studies on seaport performance efficiency. The findings obtained through the proposed methodology consider criteria at different levels of seaport management, offering valuable practical implications. Notably, this study fills a gap in the literature as no previous work has provided a comprehensive methodology for studying and analyzing ports from the perspectives of management, logistics, and macroeconomics. The system approach can also incorporate environmental considerations and innovative solutions in port infrastructure management. By proposing a new approach to interpreting statistics on Baltic seaports’ performance and presenting empirical research on sustainable development in transport and logistics systems, this study enables a multidimensional examination of seaport performance and establishes a framework for efficiency analysis and evaluation, which is crucial for effective management. The methodological scheme and algorithm for analyzing different categories of managers further facilitate the practical application of the approach. Moreover, it can serve as a strategic tool for informing regional economic policies regarding logistics and transportation.0606202610312510.5922/2079-8555-2023-2-6https://balticregion.kantiana.ru/baltic_region/5346/41901/Fedorov, G. M. (eds.), 2021, Vyzovy i perspektivy razvitiya kaliningradskoj oblasti: geopolitika i geoekonomika, Konsorcium “rubezhi Rossii”; Baltijsky Federalnyj Universitet im. Immanuila Kanta [Challenges and perspectives of development of the Kaliningrad region: geopolitics and geoeconomics, Consortium “the frontiers of Russia”; Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University], Kaliningrad, BFU named after I. Kant Publisher (in Russ.).Druzhinin, A. G. 2020, The strongholds of Russian coastal borderlands: economic dynamics amid geopolitical turbulence, Baltic region, vol. 12, № 3, p. 89—104, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2020-3-6 (in Russ.).Kammoun, R., Abdennadher, C. 2022, Seaport efficiency and competitiveness in European seaports, Transport Policy, vol. 121, p. 113—124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.04.003.Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S. 2022, Assessment of the Competitiveness and Effectiveness of an Open Business Model in the Industry 4.0 Environment, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 8, № 1, 57, https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010057.Barykin, S. E., Strimovskaya, A. V., Sergeev, S. M., Borisoglebskaya, L. N., Dedyukhina, N., Srklyarov, I., Sklyarova, J., Saychenko, L. 2023, Smart City Logistics on the Basis of Digital Tools for ESG Goals Achievement, Sustainability, vol. 15, 5507, https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065507.Li, L., Wang, J., Wang, H., Jin, X., Du, L. 2023, Intermodal transportation hub location optimization with governments subsidies under the Belt and Road Initiative, Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 231, 106414, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106414.Zuev, V. N., Ostrovskaya, E. Y., Skryabina, V. Y. 2023, Trade damper effect of regional trade agreements, Voprosy Ekonomiki, № 2, p. 83—99, https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-2-83-99 (in Russ.).Kropinova, Е. G., Afanasyeva, E. P. 2014, Sustainable development of coastal territories as a basis for integrated management of coastal zones, Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, № 1, p. 140—147 (in Russ.).Kuznetsov, A., Dinwoodie, J., Gibbs, D., Sansom, M., Knowles, H. 2015, Towards a sustainability management system for smaller ports, Marine Policy, vol. 54, p. 59—68, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.016.Druzhinin, A. G., Kuznetsova, O. V. 2023, The sea factor in the federal regulation of Russia’s spatial development: Post-Soviet experience and current priorities, Baltic region, vol. 14, № 4, p. 4—19, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2022-4-1 (in Russ.).Yin, C., Ke, Y., Chen, J., Liu, M. 2021, Interrelations between sea hub ports and inland hinterlands: Perspectives of multimodal freight transport organization and low carbon emissions, Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 214, 105919, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105919.Corey, J., Wang, Q., Zheng, J., Sun, Y., Du, H., Zhu, Z. 2022, Container transshipment via a regional hub port: A case of the Caribbean Sea region, Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 217, 105999, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105999.Bocheński, T., Palmowski, T., Studzieniecki, T. 2021, The Development of Major Seaports in the Context of National Maritime Policy. The Case Study of Poland, Sustainability, vol. 13, № 22, 12883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212883.Tagiltseva, J., Vasilenko, M., Kuzina, E., Drozdov, N., Parkhomenko, R., Prokopchuk, V., Skichko, E., Bagiryan, V. 2022, The economic efficiency justification of multimodal container transportation, Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 63, p. 264—270, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.012.Stephenson, Sh. 2015, Global Value Chains: The New Reality of International Trade, The E15 Initiative. Strengthening the Global Trade System, URL: https://e15initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/E15-GVCs-Stephenson-Final.pdf (accessed 05.12.2022).Druzhinin, A. G. 2016, Russia’s coastal zone as a social and geographic phenomenon: conceptualisation and delimitation, Baltic region, vol. 8, № 2, p. 57—67, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2016-2-5 (in Russ.).Caviedes, V., Arenas-Granados, P., Barragán-Muñoz, J. M. 2020, Regional public policy for Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Central America, Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 186, 105114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105114.Anas, A., Liu, Y. 2007, A regional economy, land use, and transportation model: formulation, algorithm design, and testing, Journal of regional science, vol. 47, № 3, p. 415—455, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00515.x.Puig, M., Azarkamand, S., Wooldridge, C., Selén, V., Darbra, R. M. 2022, Insights on the environmental management system of the European port sector, Science of The Total Environment, vol. 806, part 2, 150550, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150550.Rodrigues, V., Russo, M., Sorte, S., Reis, J., Oliveira, K., Dionísio, A., Monteiro, A., Lopes, M. 2021, Harmonizing sustainability assessment in seaports: A common framework for reporting environmental performance indicators, Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 202, 105514, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105514.Castellano, R., Ferretti, M., Musella, G., Risitano, M. 2020, Evaluating the economic and environmental efficiency of ports: Evidence from Italy, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 271, 122560, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122560.Hossain, T., Adams, M., Walker, T. R. 2021, Role of sustainability in global seaports, Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 202, 105435, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105435.Duru, O., Galvao, C. B., Mileski, J., Robles, L. T., & Gharehgozli, A. 2020, Developing a comprehensive approach to port performance assessment, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 36, № 4, p. 169—180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2020.03.001.Karpova, N. P., Pavlov, M. S. 2020, Problems and prospects of green logistics implementation in Russia, Journal of economics, entrepreneurship and law, vol. 10, № 4. p. 1063—1070, https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.10.4.100806 (in Russ.).Santos, M., Pereira, F. 2022, ESG performance scoring method to support responsible investments in port operations, Case Studies on Transport Policy, vol. 10, № 1, p. 664—673, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.027.Strimovskaya, A. V., Bazhina, D. B. 2018, Design of Efficiency Index Complex for Transportation in Supply Chains, Logistics and supply chain management, № 3, p. 55—65 (in Russ.).Tow, P., Cooper, I., Partridge, I., Birch, C., Harrington, L. 2011, Principles of a Systems Approach to Agriculture. In: Tow, P., Cooper, I., Partridge, I., Birch, C. (eds.), Rainfed Farming Systems. Springer, Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9132-2_1.Gogas, M., Papoutsis, K., Nathanail, E. 2014, Optimization of Decision-Making in Port Logistics Terminals: Using Analytic Hierarchy Process for the Case of Port of Thessaloniki, Transport and Telecommunication Journal, vol. 15, № 4, p. 255—268, https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2014-0022.Sarkar, B. D., Shankar, R. 2021, Understanding the barriers of port logistics for effective operation in the Industry 4.0 era: Data-driven decision making, International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, vol. 1, № 2, 100031, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100031.Panova, Y., Hilmola, O-P. 2015, Justification and evaluation of dry port investments in Russia, Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 51, p. 61—70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2015.07.008.Lachininskii, S. S., Semenova, I. 2015, Saint Petersburg as a global coastal city: positioning in the Baltic region, Baltic region, № 3, p. 47—57, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2015-3-4.Startceva, N. V. 2020, Analysis of the activity and competitiveness of Baltic Sea ports, System analysis and logistics, № 1 (23), p. 9—19 (in Russ.).Zub, I. V., Ezhov, Y. E., Angolenko, T. S. 2022, Information systems as a tool for improving the seaports productivity, Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova, vol. 14, № 2, p. 218—229, https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2022-14-2-218-229 (in Russ.).Khan, S. A. R., Sharif, A., Golpîra, H., Kumar, A. 2019, A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: From environmental policy and sustainable development, Sustainable Development, vol. 27, № 6, p. 1063—1075, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1958.Druzhinin, A., Mikhaylov, A., Lialina, A. 2021, Coastal regions of Russia: migration attractiveness and innovation performance, Quaestiones Geographicae, vol. 40, № 2, p. 5—18, https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2021-0019.Strimovskaya, A., Sinko, G., Tsyplakova, E. 2023, Efficiency Assessment System Based on Analytical Approach for Sustainable Development of Transport Logistics. In: Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication — RelStat 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 640, p. 162—173, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26655-3_15.Zelenskaya, Е. М. 2018, Measuring performance of cultural organizations on the data of the envelopment analysis, Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, № 2, p. 39—51 (in Russ.).Cruijssen, F., Dullaert, W., Fleuren, H. 2007, Horizontal Cooperation in Transport and Logistics: A Literature Review, Transportation Journal, vol. 46, № 3, p. 22—39, https://doi.org/10.2307/20713677.Vinogradov, A. B, Tyurkina, М. N. 2017, Methods of Gain Sharing in Horizontal Cooperation Projects, Logistics and supply chain management, № 4 (81), p. 41—51 (in Russ.).Экспансионизм в стратегической культуре Польши: историческая ретроспектива и вариацииI. D.Loshkariovhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7507-1669This article deals with the problem of assessing and interpreting expansionist elements in Poland’s international political behaviour. The problem is approached using the concept of the strategic culture of states, which covers beliefs, perceptions, and the language states use to describe their own and other countries’ actions. The study examines what expansionist types of strategic culture have developed in Poland, how relevant they are in the current political landscape, and describes their differences and similarities. To this end, the intellectual origins of foreign policy ideas prevalent in Poland (Rzeczpospolita) are traced, and the challenges of the external environment are correlated with the way they have been perceived in the course of Poland’s historical development. Two historically contingent expansionist types of strategic culture were identified. Firstly, as a medium-sized state that has faced military defeats, the Polish state has hardly embraced ideas bearing on the ‘besieged fortress’ concept. Secondly, the very culture of limited power politics has assumed some unique characteristics in the country: greater readiness to take risks and fascination with power actions. This state of affairs is largely a result of the contours of the regional project having been drawn for the neighbouring states mostly based on the negative type of consolidation (against the Muslims and later the Bolsheviks) and therefore never reaching a sufficient level of detail.0606202612613810.5922/2079-8555-2023-2-7https://balticregion.kantiana.ru/baltic_region/5347/41902/Greckiy, I. V. 2020, Neo-prometeism in Poland’s eastern policy of, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, vol. 13, № 1, p. 136—142, https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2020.109 (in Russ.).Nemensky, O. B. 2019, Polandʼs foreign policy priorities under M. Morawieckiʼs government, National Strategy Issues, № 1, p. 58—77 (in Russ.).Bespalov, A. S. 2007, Poland’s Eastern Policy after 1989, Russia and the contemporary world, № 2, p. 52—69 (in Russ.).Zvyagina, D. A. 2018, Polish foreign policy in Eastern Europe: rebirth of the “Intermarium” conception, Vestnik Diplomaticheskoj akademii MID Rossii. Rossija i mir, № 1, p. 78—86 (in Russ.).Snyder, J. L. 1977, The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Limited Nuclear Operations, Rand Corporation, 48 p.Klein, Y. 1991, A theory of strategic culture, Comparative strategy, vol. 10, № 1, p. 3—23, https://doi.org/10.1080/01495939108402827.Legro, J. W. 1996, Culture and preferences in the international cooperation two-step?, American Political Science Review, vol. 90, № 1, p. 118—137, https://doi.org/10.2307/2082802.Sondhaus, L. 2006, Strategic culture and ways of war, London: Routledge, 164 p., https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203968581.Desch, M. C. 1998, Culture clash: Assessing the importance of ideas in security studies, International Security, vol. 23, № 1, p. 141—170, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.1.141.Glenn, J. 2009, Realism versus strategic culture: Competition and collaboration?, International Studies Review, vol. 11, № 3, p. 523—551, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.00872.x.Bloomfield, A. 2012, Time to move on: Reconceptualizing the strategic culture debate, Contemporary Security Policy, vol. 33, № 3, p. 437—461, https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2012.727679.Wilson, R. W. 2000, The Many Voices of Political Culture: Assessing Different Approaches, World Politics, vol. 52, № 2, p. 246—273, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887100002616.Loshkariov, I. D., Parenkov, D. A. 2022, Non-expansionist variants of Poland’s strategic culture: a retrospective of ideas and current implications, Baltic region, vol. 14, № 2, p. 69—82, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2022-2-5.Johnston, A. I. 1995, Thinking about strategic culture, International Security, vol. 19, № 4, p. 32—64, https://doi.org/10.2307/2539119.Johnston, A. I. 1998, Cultural realism: Strategic culture and grand strategy in Chinese history, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 322 p., https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzxx9p0.D’alov, V. A. (ed.). 1993, Kratkaja istorija Pol’shi: S drevnejshih vremen do nashih dnej [Short History of Poland: from ancient to our times], Moscow: Nauka (in Russ.).Downing, B. 1993, The military revolution and political change: Origins of democracy and autocracy in early modern Europe, Priceton: Princeton University Press, 308 p., https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv173f21s.Kuźniar, R. et al. 2020, Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, 478 s.Gall Anonim, 1961, Hronika i dejanija knjazej, ili pravitelej pol’skih [Chronicles of kings or Polish rulers], Moscow: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR, 172 p. (in Russ.).Florja, B. N. 2015, Rossija, Jan Sobesskij i getman Mihail Pac v 1674—1675 gg. [Russia, Jan Sobieski and hetman Michael Pac], Drevnjaja Rus’. Voprosy medievistiki, № 1, s. 5—11 (in Russ.).Chernikova, T. V. 2020, International dynastic projects in Russia during the reign of Fyodor Ioannovich, Russia and the contemporary world, № 1, p. 6—32, https://doi.org/10.31249/rsm/2020.01.01 (in Russ.).Kamieński, A. 2019, Polityka brandenburska Jana III Sobieskiego, Prace Historyczne, vol. 146, № 2, p. 307—318, https://doi.org/10.4467/20844069ph.19.014.9910.Stolicki, J. 2017, Działania Jana III Sobieskiego w celu wzrostu znaczenia Rzeczypospolitej w Europie w latach 1674—1683, Studia Środkowoeuropejskie i Bałkanistyczne, № 25, р. 27—42, https://doi.org/10.4467/2543733xssb.17.003.7249 (in Polish).Listy Jana Sobieskiego, krola polskeigo, pisane do Królowy Maryi Kazimiry w ciągu wyprawy pod Wiedeń w roku 1683 (1882), Księgarnia Polska A. D. Bartoszewicza i M. Biernackiego, Lwów, URL: https://www.wbc.poznan.pl/dlibra/publication/83770/edition/100800 (accessed 15.10.2022).Holsti, K. J. 1991, Peace and war: Armed conflicts and international order, 1648—1989, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 400 p.Topolski, J. 2015, Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów, 1501—1795, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 973 s. (in Polish).Modzhevskij Frych, A. 1960, Ob ispravlenii gosudarstva [On improving the state], Pol’skie mysliteli jepohi Vozrozhdenija, Moscow: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR, p. 69—109 (in Russ.).Nowak, A. 2020, Między nieładem a niewolą. Krótka historia myśli politycznej, Kraków: Biały Kruk, 384 s.Simlat, M. 2003, Teoria polityczna Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego. Próba rekonstrukcji, Państwo i Społeczeństwo, № 3, p. 99—108.Nowak, A. 2007, Historie politycznych tradycji. Piłsudski, Putin i inni, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Arcana.Pietrzyk-Reeves, D. 2017, Państwo jako rzecz wspólna (res publica) w renesansowej myśli politycznej, in: Wartości polityczne Rzeczypospolitej Obojga Narodów. Struktury aksjologiczne i granice cywilizacyjne, vol. 3, Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, р. 27—51.Rostworowski, E. M. 1985, Popioły i korzenie. Szkice historyczne i rodzinne, Kraków: Znak, 568 р.Zięba, R. 2020, Poland’s Foreign and Security Policy, Springer International Publishing, 280 p., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30697-7.Neumann, I. 2004, Ispol’zovanie «Drugogo»: Obrazy Vostoka v formirovanii evropejskih indentichnostej [Uses of the Other: The “East” in European Identity Formation], Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo (in Russ.).Majorova, O. N. 1999, Rol’ i mesto Pol’shi v sovremennoj Evrope: (diskussii v pol’skom obshhestve) [Role and place of Poland in current Europe: public discussion], Slavjanovedenie, № 3, p. 30—44 (in Russ.).Loshkariov, I. D., Kuchuk, A. V. 2022, Poland’s Strategic Culture: Variations and Their Reflection in Official Discourse, Sovremennaya Evropa, № 4, p. 37—49, https://doi.org/10.31857/S0201708322040039.Иностранное наследие в мемориальном ландшафте Калининградской областиD. V.Mankevichhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2983-1962M. E.Megemhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6412-9119This article aims to analyse the structure of sites in the Kaliningrad region commemorating events, phenomena or figures of international history, as well as to reveal their symbolic significance. The study uses empirical data on the origin, time of construction and purpose of the monuments, memorials and other places of commemoration. Theoretically, it draws on the concepts of cultural memory and sites of memory. The idiographic and historiographic methods were employed along with general scientific methods. At the core of the region’s international memorial landscape structure are sites commemorating the German past of the area or linked to Lithuanian and, less frequently, Polish national cultures. The structure of the memorial heritage is largely a product of the selective preservation of pre-war monuments and constructions in the Soviet period and post-Soviet commemorative activities in the Kaliningrad region, ‘a region of cooperation’. Its most substantial, German, component is a complex symbolic system honouring the intellectual culture of East Prussia and its prominent figures. And, not unlike its Lithuanian and Polish components, it lacks inner unity. Most of the memorial objects examined have been integrated into all-Russian or regional historical narratives and corresponding discourses. Reflecting the ‘Russian story line’ in the local history, it has been appropriated by the local culture of memory.0606202613915510.5922/2079-8555-2023-2-8https://balticregion.kantiana.ru/baltic_region/5347/41903/Alimpieva, A. V. 2004, Exclave Russian region: the problem of social identity, Region of cooperation, № 17, p. 45—56 (in Russ.).Alimpieva, A. V. 2009, Social’naja identichnost’ kaliningradcev v social’nom i geopoliticheskom kontekste [Social Identity of Kaliningraders in the Social and Geopolitical Context], Pskov Journal of Regional Studies, № 7, p. 36—42 (in Russ.).Andreychuk, N.V., Gavrinina, L. M. 2011, Fenomen kaliningradskoj regional “noj subkul’’tury (social’’no-filosofskij i kul’’turologicheskij analiz, [The phenomenon of the Kaliningrad regional subculture (socio-philosophical and culturological analysis)], Kaliningrad, IKBFU Publishing house, p. 1—140 (in Russ.).Kostyashov, Yu. V. (ed.). 2002, Vostochnaja Prussija glazami sovetskih pereselencev: Pervye gody Kaliningradskoj oblasti v vospominanijah i dokumentah [East Prussia through the eyes of Soviet settlers: The first years of the Kaliningrad region in memoirs and documents], Saint-Peterburg, Belveder (in Russ.).Kostyashov, Yu. V., Matthes, E. 2003, Izgnanie prusskogo duha. Zapreshhennoe vospominanie [The expulsion of the Prussian spirit. Forbidden memory] Kaliningrad, KSU Publishing house, p. 1—164 (in Russ.).Fostova, S. A., Kostyashov, Yu. V. 2020, Monumental’naja propaganda v sovetskom Kaliningrade: ot vojny pamjatnikov do mira [Monumental Propaganda in Soviet Kaliningrad: From War of Monuments to Peace], Studencheskie Smol’nye chtenija, Saint-Peterburg, Asterion, p. 230—237 (in Russ.).Kostyashov, Yu. V. 2017, Vosprijatie i memorializacija kul’turnogo proshlogo Kjonigsberga v sovremennom Kaliningrade [Perception and memorialization of the cultural past of Koenigsberg in modern Kaliningrad], Modernizacija kul’tury: ot cheloveka tradicii k kreativnomu subyektu. Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, p. 237—241 (in Russ.).Dementyev, I. O. 2016, A ‘Divided history’: the politics of memory on the territory of the former East Prussia in the light of current discussions, Baltic region, vol. 7, № 4, p. 77—88, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2015-4-6.Dementyev, I. O. 2019, Jejdtkunen kak mesto pamjati [Eidtkunen as a place of remembrance[, Kaliningradskie arhivy, №16, p. 188—200 (in Russ.).Dementyev, I. O. 2020, Soviet-Era Civic Monuments in the Cultural Landscape of Kaliningrad, Nasledie vekov — Heritage of Centuries, № 3, р. 40—61, https://doi.org/10.36343/SB.2020.23.3.003 (in Russ.).Dementyev, I. O. 2012, Kaliningradskaja oblast’ kak zona dialoga kul’tur i stolknovenija mest pamjati [Kaliningrad region as a zone of dialogue of cultures and clash of places of memory], Mezhdu Oderom i Nemanom: problemy istoricheskoj pamjati, [Between the Oder and the Neman: problems of historical memory], Kaliningrad, p. 26—35 (in Russ.).Brodersen, P. 2008, Die Stadt im Westen. Wie Königsberg Kaliningrad wurde, Düsseldorf.Sakson, A. 2011, Od Klajpedy do Olsztyna. Współcześni mieszkańcy byłych Prus Wschodnich: Kraj Kłajpedzki, Obwód Kaliningradzki, Warmia i Mazury, Poznań.Sakson, A. 2017, Dziedzictwo Prus Wschodnich. Socjologiczne i historyczne studia o regione, Olsztyn.Traba, R., Sakson, A. (eds.). 2017, Przeszłość zapamiȩtana. Naracje z pogranicze, Olsztyn.Nora, P. 2005, World celebration of memory, Neprikosnovennyj zapas [Emergency ration], № 2 (in Russ.).Assman, Ya. 2004, Kul’turnaja pamjat’: Pis’mo, pamjat’ o proshlom i politicheskaja identich-nost’ v vysokih kul’turah drevnosti [Cultural memory: Writing, memory of the past and political identity in the high cultures of antiquity], М., Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Hutton, P. 2003, History as an art of memory, Saint-Peterburg, Vladimir Dal (in Russ.).Eksle, O. G. 2001, Cultural memory influenced by historicism, Odissej. Chelovek v istorii [Odysseus. Man in history], p. 176—198 (in Russ.).Assman, А. 2017, Raspalas’ svjaz’ vremen? Vzlet i padenie temporal’nogo rezhima moderna [Broke the connection of time? The Rise and Fall of the Modern Temporal Regime], М., Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (in Russ.).Repina, L. P. 2013, Memory of the past as a bone of contention, or once again about (inter)disciplinarity, Istoričeskij žurnal. Naučnye issledovaniâ, № 1 (13), p. 25— 32, https://doi.org/10.7256/2222-1972.2013.01.3 (in Russ.).Savelyeva, I. M., Poletayev, A. V. 2011, The social organization of the knowledge of the past: analytical scheme, Dialogue with time, № 35, p. 7—18 (in Russ.).Assman, А. 2019, Zabvenie istorii — oderzhimost’ istoriej [Forgetting history — obsession with history], М., Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (in Russ.).Miller, А. I., Efremenko, D. V. (eds.). 2020, The politics of memory in contemporary Russia and in countries of Eastern Europe, St. Petersburg, European University at St. Petersburg.Khudaykulova, A. V., Neklyudov, N. Y. 2019, The Concept of Ontological Security in International Political Discourse, MGIMO Review of International Relations, vol. 12, № 6, p. 129—149, https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-6-69-129-149 (in Russ.).Makhotina, E. 2021, Between heritage and (identity) politics: dealing with the signs of communism in post-Soviet Lithuania, National Identities, vol. 23, № 5, p. 511— 530 (in Russ.).Rosenberg, T. J. 2015. Contemporary Holocaust Memorials in Berlin: On the Borders of the Sacred and the Profane. In: Revisiting Holocaust Representation in the Post-Witness Era. The Holocaust and its Contexts. Palgrave Macmillan, London, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530424_6.Cole, T. 2013, Crematoria, barracks, gateway: Survivors’ return visits to the memory landscapes of Auschwitz. History and Memory, vol. 25, № 2, p. 102—131, https://doi.org/10.2979/histmemo.25.2.102.Megem, M. E. 2022, Preserve vs dismantle: major trends in the Baltics’ politics of memory regarding soviet monuments at sites of mass violence, Baltic region, vol. 14, № 4, p. 128—145, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2022-4-8.Megem, M. E., Filev, M. V., Davidenko, A. A. 2022, Demolish, recode, integrate and marginalise: Key strategies for the Baltic States in relation to Soviet monuments, Science. Society. Defense, vol. 10, № 4, p. 26, https://doi.org/10.24412/2311-1763-2022-4-26-26 (in Russ.).Filev, M. V., Kurganskii, A. A. 2023, Dismantling monuments as the core of the post-2014 ‘decommunisation’ in Ukraine and Poland, Baltic region, vol. 14, № 4, p. 146—161, https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2022-4-9.Safronovas, V. 2011, Identity of the Lithuanian-Speaking Population of East Prussia: Interpretations at the Turn of the 20th and 21st Centuries, Issledovanie Baltijskogo regiona: vestnik Social’no-gumanitarnogo parka BFU im. I. Kanta, № 2 (8), p. 4—26 (in Russ.).